Reuben Foster is cleared but why isn‘t clear

By – – Sunday, April 14, 2019


Friday afternoon the news broke that the would not be suspending linebacker despite two arrests for domestic violence last year — with the charges dropped in both cases — finding the linebacker did not violate the league’s personal conduct policy.

The , who claimed on waivers after the San Francisco 49ers released him following his arrest in Tampa on Nov. 24, then issued this statement:

“Everyone in this league is held to a higher standard. understands that his past actions have led a lot of people to doubt him, and he has committed to doing the work necessary to earn the trust of his teammates, our great fans, and the .”

The have put in place a comprehensive responsibility and accountability plan to help be successful on and off the field. Elements of this plan include individual counseling, a structured living arrangement, weekly meetings with the club player engagement director, weekly meetings with our team chaplain, and targeted community service engagements.

“We have been very clear with that his past does not have to determine his future — but the responsibility is squarely on him to change. must fully adhere to the plan we have developed for him. knows that we simply will not tolerate any future conduct that is detrimental to the or to the .”

That’s how the plan to handle .

My question is — why?

Why all these steps put in place for a player who had the charges dropped against him and who, after an investigation by the , was not suspended?

Why the individual counseling? A structured living arrangement? Weekly meeting with the club player engagement director, the team chaplain and targeted community service engagements for a player who was simply fined two game checks by the league for a “review of recent incidents and an assessment of his adherence to obligations arising from previous violations of league policy.”

was suspended when he was in San Francisco by the league for the first two games of 2018 for violating the league’s conduct and substance abuse policies.

But those were related to marijuana charges in Alabama and weapons charges in connection with his first arrest on domestic violence charges, which were dismissed by a judge after the victim — who would be the same woman involved in the Tampa incident — recanted her claim.

The weapons charge was reduced to a misdemeanor and the marijuana charge dropped after he agreed to enter a program for first-time offenders.

Are we to conclude that needs all this counseling, supervision and structure because he had a gun and smoked pot? If that is the case, then half the league should be signed up for the redemption program.

So then why this “comprehensive responsibility and accountability plan” for ? What is everyone afraid of?

Despite this notion that has been “cleared” by the ’s decision not to suspend him, it’s clear that those at Park believe there is reason to be concerned about ’s behavior.

The domestic violence charges may have been dismissed or dropped in both cases, but in the first case in Santa Clara, the district attorney said he believed that the woman, Elissa Ennis, was lying in her recantation.

As far as the district attorney was concerned, beat Ms. Ennis.

“We are disappointed because the evidence demonstrated that seriously hurt his girlfriend,” district attorney Jeffrey Rosen said in a statement. “Some have wondered why we still think hurt his girlfriend when she said that he didn’t. Recantation is common among domestic-violence victims. Some are scared, some feel guilty, some are coerced, some need money. Whatever the cause, we move forward on cases when victims falsely recant because we know that if we don’t more victims will be hurt.”

So now team president Bruce Allen, the Prince of Darkness, whose name was attached to the Friday’s statement, will be Father Flanagan, running a halfway house to save . For ’s sake, let’s hope they do that better than running a football team.

• Hear Thom Loverro on 106.7 The Fan Wednesday afternoons and Saturday and Sunday mornings and on the Kevin Sheehan Show podcast every Tuesday and Thursday.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on, our third-party provider. Please read our before commenting.


Click to and View Comments

Click to Hide

Receive News & Ratings Via Email - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings with's FREE daily email newsletter.